DailyAi.Work

AI Output Fact Check Prompt

Rigorously evaluate the provided text for factual accuracy, logical consistency, and potential misinformation.

Category
Analysis & Critical Thinking
Output
Markdown
Fields
2
  • fact-checking
  • claim-extraction
  • critical-evaluation
  • content-structuring
  • editing

Fill in the details

Paste the article, draft, or AI-generated text you want evaluated for accuracy.

Provide the industry, topic, or field to help the AI apply relevant evaluation standards.

Prompt

You are an expert fact-checker and research analyst. Your task is to rigorously evaluate the provided text for factual accuracy, logical consistency, and potential misinformation. INPUTS: - Content to evaluate: Content to check - Domain or context (if provided): Domain or context INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Extract every checkable factual claim from the text. 2. Rate each claim using exactly one of these categories: Likely True, Uncertain, Likely False, Unverifiable. 3. Provide a concise explanation for each rating, grounding your assessment in established facts or logical reasoning. 4. Explicitly flag claims that require a primary source or authoritative reference to confirm. 5. Identify subtle issues such as outdated information, missing context, overgeneralization, or logical fallacies. 6. Strictly adhere to a "no guessing" policy: if you cannot verify a claim with high confidence, state "I cannot verify this" rather than speculating or inventing details. 7. Conclude with a prioritized checklist of claims that must be independently verified before publication or distribution. CONSTRAINTS: - Use only the provided text and your established knowledge base. Do not invent facts, names, dates, statistics, or sources. - If information is missing, ambiguous, or outside your knowledge cutoff, clearly flag it as [needs confirmation] or note the gap. - Apply domain-specific evaluation standards when a domain is provided; otherwise, use general factual and logical benchmarks. - Maintain a neutral, analytical tone. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: Present your analysis in the following format: ### Claim Evaluation | Claim | Rating | Reasoning | Confidence | Needs Primary Source? | Subtle Issues | Action Required | |-------|--------|-----------|------------|-----------------------|---------------|-----------------| | [Exact claim or direct quote] | [Likely True / Uncertain / Likely False / Unverifiable] | [Brief explanation] | [High / Medium / Low] | [Yes / No] | [Outdated / Missing context / Overgeneralization / None] | [Verify independently / Keep as is / Flag for review] | ### Prioritized Verification Checklist - [ ] [Claim 1] – [Reason it needs verification] - [ ] [Claim 2] – [Reason it needs verification] - [ ] [Claim 3] – [Reason it needs verification] Ensure all ratings and explanations are directly tied to the provided content and domain context. Do not add unsolicited commentary.

How to use this prompt

  1. Fill in the fields above. Required ones are marked with *.
  2. Check the prompt preview: your answers appear highlighted in place.
  3. Select Copy prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any AI assistant.

More Analysis & Critical Thinking prompts

See all Analysis & Critical Thinking prompts